一： 主持人开场白
（1）主题：关于动物实验的辩论
（2） 目的：认识到人类应该在尊重动物福利的合理性存在的同时以科学、认真、人道的态度来进行动物实验。
（3）方式：我们将会采取辩论的方式来展示我们的presentation.，（4）（4）我们先欣赏一个影片吧。
the host：good morning ，we are free loop ,it is our pleasure to show our presentation to you.our topic is “Debate about animal testing”. the purpose of our presentation is to recognize that human beings should exist in the rationality of the respect animal
welfare， at the same time with scientific and serious attitude for animal experiments. We will take the debate's way to show it. Firstly ,Let's enjoy a movie: 《猩球崛起:黎明之战》(Dawn of the Planet of the Apes
引出话题：生物医学的每一次重大发展与进步，几乎都与动物实验息息相关，动物实验由此奠定了在整个生物医学发展中的重要地位，但是，近年来由于动物保护运动的兴起，保护动物权利的呼声愈来愈高涨，动物实验面临动物权利论的伦理挑战。
Biomedical every important development and progress, almost all is closely related to animal experiments,so animal experiments laid the important position
in the whole development of biomedical, however, In recent years due to the rise of the animal protection movement, to protect animal rights calls for more and more high, the animal experiment should faces a series of animal ethical challenges
（5）定义：到底什么是动物实验？ 是指为了弄清药物的性能，用动物进行试验。
What is animal testing? it is in order to find out the performance of the drug testing on animals.
二：辩论开始：
1 、现在让我们听听正反双方的想法吧。请双方表达各自的基本观点。Now let`s listen to the idea of both sides。Now ,please the two sides express your basic point.
（1）正方观点：生物医学的进步必须依赖动物实验，以达到研究甚至治愈疾病的目的。所以动物实验是必要的，应大力支持。
The advance of biomedicine have to depend on animal experiments to the goal of studying even healing sicknesses. Therefore animal experiments are absolutely necessary which should be supported powerfully.
（2）反方观点：如同人一样，动物也能感受痛苦与快乐， 所有动物品种都是平等的，如果以一种导致痛苦、难受和死亡的方式来对待人在道德上是错误的，那么，以同样的方式来对待动物也是错误的。应该平等地考虑人和动物的利益，把二者的利益看得同等重要。
所以，我们不能牺牲人类，所以我们也不能牺牲无辜的动物，应该寻早其他的替代方法来促进科学的发展。
All animals are equal, animals can also feel pain like people.
Treating people in a pain way is wrong, so, to treat animals in the same way is also wrong. Therefore , we should consider the interests of the people and animals equally. So, we can't sacrifice the human and innocent animals .we should find other alternative methods to promote the development of science.
2、请举出例子论述各自观点。
Please, take examples to show your respective point of view.
（1）正方观点：没有人喜欢用动物做实验，这是不得已的选择。科学家们也会从物种等级角度去考虑问题。能用虫子，他们就不会用老鼠；能用老鼠，就不会用兔子。只要可以用任何其他动物代替，就不会用灵长类动物。
It’s really have to do experiments on animals though no one likes that. Researchers also consider the species level . They will not use mouses when worms are available ; Similarly ,they won’t use rabbits when mousses are feasible. They won’t use primates as long as it can be substituded by any other animals.
一名帕金森症患者马克·戴维斯曾经是一名机械修理师，帕金森症已经困扰了他15年。但得益于一种“深度脑部刺激”医疗技术，他现在的活动几乎与常人无异。这是经过在猴
子身上实验才作用于帕金森综合征患者的技术。让猴子免受痛苦，还是恢复戴维斯的正常生活能力，孰轻孰重？
Mark Davis , a mechanical repairman , had been bothered by Pakinsonism for 15 years .Thanks to a medical technology of deep brain stimulation ( DBS) ,his daily life became absolutely normal.DBS had been done experiments on monkeys sucessfully ; Then it has contributed to patients with Pakinson’s disease. Which is more important for us ? Let monkeys keep away from pains or let Davis restore normal life ability ?
（2）反方观点：按照传统，也许动物实验是医学研究不可缺少的手段和方法，但是，动物实验操作时不可避免地要给动物造成一定程度的恐惧、疼痛甚至献出生命。我们主张是保障动物福利。我们应该让动物在健康快乐的状态下生活。近几年我国出现的疫病的流行禽流感、猪链球菌病、手足口病、甲型H1N1流感等疫病的流行与国内不重视动物福利有一定的联系。：而且，在临床上耗费很多动物进行实验，可是很多动物都是白白牺牲的，一部分研究者并没有秉持严谨的科研态度，而没有得出任何临床收获。
According to traditional views, experiments on animals may be an indispensable means and methods of medical research. however, animal experiment operation will inevitably cause a certain degree of fear and pain to them, and even more will lost their lives. Our advocation is that we should guarantee the welfare of animals. we should let them live in a happy and healthy condition. In recent years , such as pig streptococcus disease, bird flu, hand, foot and mouth disease, swine flu epidemics have appeared one by one In our country,They must have a connection with the domestic that do not take
consideration of the animal welfare.
3、主持人：请双方针对对方提出疑问。请正方提出疑问：
Both sides can ask the other side .The affirmative,please
（1）正方观点：你们反对动物实验，认为动物实验没有必要的，是残忍的，那么你们能够具体的解释原因吗？
Do you have any specific reasons while you are against the animal experiments as well as considering they are needlessly and merciless ?
（2）反方观点：谢谢你们的提问。
（a）动物与人类在生理结构上是不同的，因此由动物实验得到的结果并不能准确地应用于人类。此外，对于不同物种来说，环境、机体以及心理之间的相互作用具有极大的差异，因此动物实验的利用价值是非常值得怀疑的。而监禁、伤害等经历则进一步扩大了人与实验动物之间的差距。
（b）动物也有权利!曾经是一名动物研究者，现为美国反活体解剖社团（American Anti Vivisection Society）的成员John McArdle说过：当科学家从事动物研究的时候，他们违背了动物应免受于遭受非自然的疾病、伤害，或心理以及行为问题的这种权利。
Thank you for your question
I will explain it in two ways.First, animal and human are different on the
physical structure, so the results of animal experiment cannot be accurately applied to humans. In addition, for different species, environment, and the interaction between the body and mental have great difference, so the use value of animal experiments is very suspicious. Second, animals also have the right! John Mc Ardle, as a member of America's anti-vivisection society, said: when scientists engaged in animal studies, they violated this kind of right that the animals should be protected from the nature of diseaseand injury.
请反方提出疑问：
The opponent, please!
（3）反方观点： 我们认为动物实验是对动物伦理的一种蔑视，动物也是有情感的，是人类的好伙伴，从伦理学角度讲，动物实验有违道德。动物有爱，何况人呢？难道科学研究非得使用动物研究，科技一直进步，难道没有可替代的方式？请你们告诉大家你们为什么非得使用动物研究。
We believe that the animal experiment is a kind of contempt for animal ethics . Animals also have emotions, is human good partner. From the ethical point of view, animal testing is morally wronq.animals have love,let alone man . 加图片2 With the science and technology has been progress, is there no alternative way? Will you please tell you why you have to use animals to study? Thanks !
（4）正方观点：谢谢你们的提问。
1.就目前的情况来说，虽然我们可以采用一切可行的技术和手段，改善动物实验，但是没有能够完全替代动物实验的方式。
2.动物实验避免了在人身上进行实验所带来的风险，如辐射对机体的损伤也不可能在人身上反复实验。另外，临床上很难收集平时不易见到的疾病如放射病、毒气中毒、烈性传染病等病人，而实验室可以根据研究目的要求在动物身上复制出来
Thank you for your questions.
Firstly,as things stand,though we could use all available technologies and means to improve the animal experiments ,there has no way to replace them completely .
Secondly , animal experiments avoid the risks at human beings .Such as radiation damage . In addition ,It’s difficult to collect rare diseases such as gas poisoning ,deadly infectious diseases in clinical while laboratory can copy out on animals according to the research requirements.
三：最后总结：
主持人：由此可见，在这种越来越激烈的争论下，动物研究面临着一系列的挑战，动物伦理与动物福利也越来越受到大家重视，到目前为止，还没有从真正意义上解决生物医学研究中关于动物实验的伦理问题，这是一个漫长的过程，“3R”原则就有着必要的存在价值：减少（reduce）每一次实验中所需要的动物数量；优化（refine）现有的实验，以减少动物所受到的痛苦和伤害；使用其他的手段来取代（replace）动物实验。
最后我们必须明白，对科学提出质疑并不是反对科学，对人类与动物之间的关系提出疑问并不等于主张人类永远都不要使用动物。对科学提出质疑将产生更好的、更负责任的科学，而对人类使用动物的方法提出质疑将导致对于动物使用的更明智的决定，相信，将来我们不会再重复过去的错误，人类和其他动物将和平地分享地球上有限的资源。
Thus, under the increasingly heated debate, animal research is facing a series of challenges, animal ethics and animal welfare is becoming more and more widely, so far, has not yet been in solving biomedical research from real questions about the ethics of animal experiments, it is a long process, the existence of \"3 r\" principle is necessaryly value: reduce the number of animals needed in each experiment. Refine existing experiments, in order to reduce animal suffering and injury; Use other means to replace animal experiment.
Finally, we must understand that question in science will produce better, more responsible science, and raised questions about the method of using animals to human beings will cause for animal use smarter decisions, believe that we will not repeat the mistakes of the past in the future, humans and other animals will peacefully share limited resources on the earth